No matter how you slice it, Emefa Hardcastle was wrong; but Annoh-Dompreh should have taken the joke

In the halls of power, decorum is not just a courtesy, but a fundamental principle that underscores our democratic framework. 

The recent altercation between Victoria Emefa Hardcastle, the Acting Chief Executive Officer of the Petroleum Commission, and Frank Annoh-Dompreh, the Minority Chief Whip, has thrust this principle into the spotlight, serving as a cautionary tale for public officeholders. 

No matter how you slice it, Emefa Hardcastle’s conduct in this matter was grossly inappropriate and wholly unacceptable. However, Frank Annoh-Dompreh‘s actions leading up to the altercation warrant scrutiny as well, as they may have contributed to the escalation of tensions.

The incident unfolded on January 28, 2025, during a recess of the Appointments Committee’s vetting session. 

According to multiple, the sequence of events paints a picture of provocation and escalation on both sides. Annoh-Dompreh approached Dr. Omane during the recess, where Hardcastle, seated nearby, suggested that the Minority Chief Whip and his colleagues return to vet the nominee.

In response, Annoh-Dompreh allegedly remarked, “We will not vet him today. You guys haven’t seen anything yet.“

It was at this point that Hardcastle replied, “You are a micro minority; what can you do?” Annoh-Dompreh, visibly upset by the remark, countered, “You call me micro minority; I will deal with you in public.” Hardcastle then retorted, “Who are you to deal with me?“

This exchange highlights a mutual breakdown in decorum, with both parties failing to de-escalate the situation. Annoh-Dompreh’s words, though provocative, did not warrant Hardcastle’s public and combative response, which only served to amplify the tension.

The situation further escalated when, during their verbal confrontation, Hardcastle indirectly called Annoh-Dompreh “silly.” When confronted by Annoh-Dompreh, who claimed she had called him “silly,” Hardcastle sharply responded, “Did I mention your name?” 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hPWn-pk7OIc

Such indirect jabs, though veiled, left little ambiguity about whom she was addressing. This exchange, captured on video and widely circulated, has drawn widespread condemnation for its lack of professionalism and maturity.

Annoh-Dompreh, visibly perturbed by the confrontation, expressed his intent to address the matter formally. He subsequently petitioned the Speaker of Parliament, Alban Bagbin, calling for Hardcastle to be summoned before the Privileges Committee to account for her conduct. 

Speaker Bagbin has since scheduled Hardcastle to appear on January 30, 2025, with a promise to update the House by January 31.

While Hardcastle’s conduct was undoubtedly inappropriate, it is important to also examine the role of Annoh-Dompreh in this incident. 

As a senior Member of Parliament and Minority Chief Whip, he carries the responsibility of setting a high standard of decorum. If his comments were indeed sarcastic or dismissive, they were ill-advised and unbecoming of his position. Leadership demands the ability to de-escalate tensions, not inflame them. By engaging in provocative rhetoric, Annoh-Dompreh may have contributed to the escalation of this unfortunate episode.

The implications of this incident extend beyond the personal affront to Annoh-Dompreh. Parliament, as the cornerstone of our democracy, demands respect from all quarters. For a public servant to openly confront and demean an elected representative is not only a breach of protocol, but a direct challenge to the sanctity of the institution itself.

This is why Haruna Iddrisu, the Member of Parliament for Tamale South and Minister of Education, called for Hardcastle to issue a public apology and retract her statements. Iddrisu’s intervention, despite being on the NDC’s side of the house, underscores the need for unity and decorum, particularly in these politically charged times – I totally doff my hat off to him for that.

Hardcastle’s actions also raise questions about her judgment and suitability for leadership. Appointed just weeks ago by President John Dramani Mahama, she has already managed to embroil herself in a controversy that detracts from her mandate to steer the Petroleum Commission.

Leadership, especially in a public office, demands not just competence but also emotional intelligence and respect for established norms. Her actions thus far suggest a lack of the latter, casting a shadow over her tenure even before it has truly begun.

This incident is also a timely reminder of the standards to which public officials must be held. In a society where political tensions often run high, it is imperative that those in leadership positions set an example of civility and professionalism. Hardcastle’s failure to do so is a stark reminder of the consequences of arrogance and impetuosity in public service. The damage done to her credibility and, by extension, the institution she represents, will not be easily undone.

A public apology from Hardcastle is not just desirable but necessary. It is the first step in mending the damage done to parliamentary decorum and public trust. Beyond this, there must be a broader conversation about the standards of behaviour expected from public officials, particularly those who interact with Parliament.

The altercation is a sobering reminder of the importance of respect and professionalism in our democratic institutions. While Hardcastle’s actions were wrong on many counts, Annoh-Dompreh’s role in instigating the exchange cannot be ignored. Both individuals must reflect on their conduct and strive to uphold the principles of decorum and respect that underpin our democracy. 

The post No matter how you slice it, Emefa Hardcastle was wrong; but Annoh-Dompreh should have taken the joke first appeared on 3News.

Read Full Story